Mike
I read a paper that said instead of graphene oxide in the shot, it seems to be graphene hydroxide. He said graphene hydroxide is difficult to detect. He did his dissertation on graphene hydroxide, which he said is nonbiodegradable, and therefore, the time it would be in someone's body could be much longer than thought. He also said that graphene hydroxide is very difficult to impossible to detect in an autopsy.

I put out a feeler on Substack to see what people thought, but they didn't really address the Hydroxide question.
It was a Substack of physicians discussing the shot, but maybe I need a chemist to ask.

My question would be: "Would it be outside the realm of possibility for what we think is graphene oxide to actually be graphene hydroxide?"
This could be a game changer - not one we might prefer, but a game changer nonetheless. Pl answer.